Why Does Kinnara’s CEO Continue to Claim Lux Projects Is “Shut Down” When It Is Clearly Operating?

Why Does Kinnara’s CEO Continue to Claim Lux Projects Is “Shut Down” When It Is Clearly Operating?

In any major commercial dispute, there is a clear distinction between legal reality and narrative control. The ongoing public statements by Kinnara’s CEO, Adrian Campbell, claiming that Lux Projects has been “shut down” or is “no longer operating”, sit in direct contradiction to observable facts.

Lux Projects continues to operate, build, contract, employ staff, and progress multiple developments in Indonesia.

This raises an obvious question:

Why does Kinnara continue to promote a version of events that does not align with reality?

The answer does not require speculation about criminal intent. It can be understood through well-documented patterns seen in high-conflict corporate disputes.


1. Narrative Survival

Once a party loses control of a project or is removed from management, the public narrative often becomes the last remaining source of leverage.

If Lux Projects is visibly operating and continuing construction, it directly undermines any suggestion that Kinnara still holds authority or legitimacy over Marina Bay City. Repeating claims that Lux is “shut down” appears designed to make narrative override facts.


2. Investor Containment

Many investors rely heavily on public statements when deciding who to trust.

By asserting that Lux is closed, illegal, or under investigation, Kinnara discourages investors from:

  • Contacting Lux directly

  • Independently verifying facts

  • Reviewing documentation and banking trails

This strategy keeps uncertainty alive and delays accountability.


3. Pressure Through Fear

References to:

  • Police involvement

  • Immigration action

  • Company shutdowns

  • Regulatory enforcement

are commonly used in commercial disputes as pressure tactics.

Whether such actions ever materialise is often secondary. Their purpose is psychological:
to intimidate, exhaust, and force concessions.


4. Resistance to Loss of Control

When operational authority is lost, some executives shift from:

  • controlling companies
    to

  • attempting to control perception

The battleground moves from boardrooms to social media, intermediaries, and media channels.


5. Reputational Preservation

Kinnara has long marketed itself as a major regional property developer.

Being removed from a flagship project like Marina Bay City undermines that image. Accepting a buyout and quietly exiting would require accepting failure to deliver on promises.

For some, continuing conflict feels easier than accepting defeat.


6. Confusing Spending with Power

Heavy expenditure on:

  • Lawyers

  • Intermediaries

  • Media campaigns

  • Regulatory complaints

can create the belief that persistence alone will change outcomes.

When it doesn’t, frustration often escalates behaviour rather than resolving it.


7. Avoidance of Accountability

If:

  • Investor funds were paid into Kinnara-controlled accounts, and

  • Construction funds were not passed to the developer

those facts cannot be erased by repeating claims that Lux Projects is “shut down”.

They remain matters of:

  • Banking records

  • Contracts

  • Permits

  • Ownership documents


The Reality Check

The facts are straightforward:

  • A company that is building is not shut down

  • A company that is contracting and employing is not shut down

  • A company holding active land titles, permits, and development plans is not shut down

Statements do not close companies.
Courts and regulators do.

And to date, Lux Projects continues to operate.


Evidence vs Narrative

What is increasingly visible is a widening gap between:

  • What Kinnara claims publicly, and

  • What documentation and observable activity show

This dispute no longer revolves around opinion or personality. It revolves around evidence:

  • Who controls which entities

  • Where investor funds were paid

  • Whether funds were transferred to construction

  • What media releases were issued and approved

  • Who is actually building on the ground


Conclusion

No amount of repetition can replace facts.

Transparency always outlasts narrative.
Truth does not require exaggeration, threats, or intimidation.

It only requires records.

Original Source:
https://businessreviewasia.news/why-does-kinnaras-ceo-continue-to-claim-lux-projects-is-shut-down-when-it-is-clearly-operating-in-any-major-commercial-dispute-there-is-a-difference-between-legal-reality/